|
|
Security
 |
 |
 |
 |
Sugar everywhere |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Submitted by sverma on Tuesday, September 16, 2008 - 06:47 |
Distribution | Fedora | Linux | Miscellaneous | News | OLPC | Security | XO |
 |
 |
55,000 Sugar/GNU/Linux XO machines are being shipped every month to kids all over the world. This is a generation getting ready to break the bonds of digital dependencies and building a commons for themselves on free and open source software and open content and standards. In the meantime, Microsoft announced a pilot study to run Windows XP on these very machines.
So, let's do a quick comparison:
Sugar is built on top of Fedora 9, the current and cutting edge version of Linux from RedHat, which then in turn creates its commercial platform based on Fedora releases. So, with Sugar, you get fresh code. Windows XP is from 2001. I was much younger then and had no grey hair Even at that, it is some specialized version of XP that you can get only if you are a third worlder. Its called Windows XP UP where UP stands for Unlimited Potential. Unlimited potential for whom? The users or the company? XP is no longer sold in the US, so the revenue er, I mean "potential" has to come from someplace else.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Response time for bug fixing |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Submitted by sverma on Saturday, September 29, 2007 - 16:55 |
Security |
 |
 |
Here's an example for response turnaround time for fixing bugs. This one has to do with a buffer overflow in OpenSSL. The vulnerability was reported on September 27 in this thread. This morning (Sept 29), Ubuntu had two patches waiting for me. One is for OpenSSL, and the other is for libssl, the library that implements SSL. The vulnerability is the same. The update was actually released 17 hours ago, so It was no more than a day after the vulnerability was revealed.
Of course, there are bugs that don't get patched for a long, long time, but in most of the cases, we see quick turnaround times in open source. This is yet another case where "many eyeballs make bugs shallow".
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|